Owns what the work looks like and what it says.
Reports to the Executive Chairman. Titled Creative Lead; joined against the rest of the system on the track name Creative Lead.
Joined from governance/pipelines.json where owner_role is Creative Lead — 1 of 13. Ownership here means responsible for it existing and working, which is not the same as deciding what it produces.
| Pipeline | Brand | Status | Priority | On air in (block lead) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Storyboards, scripts and style direction | Every brand | partial | 1 | BRIEF (Executive Manager), CROSS (counterparts), DEMO (each participant) |
Named in supporting_roles on 6 pipelines. Supporting is not owning. The owner is accountable for the thing working; this seat is accountable for its own contribution to it, and the distinction is what stops a stalled pipeline having two people who each thought it was the other's.
| Pipeline | Brand | Status | Priority | On air in (block lead) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Universal brand baseline | Every brand | partial | 2 | BUILD (Technical Operator), CROSS (counterparts) |
| Curation and repost engine | Every brand | missing | 7 | PUBLISH (Technical Operator) |
| PDP tile GIF engine | Lil Shop of Culture | missing | 9 | BUILD (Technical Operator) |
| Virtual lookbook engine | Lil Shop of Culture | missing | 10 | BUILD (Technical Operator), DEMO (each participant) |
| Bully mascot worlds | Lil Shop of Culture | missing | 11 | BUILD (Technical Operator) |
| Any-brand intake | Every brand | missing | 12 | BRIEF (Executive Manager), ADJUST (Executive Manager) |
led_by. The count is genuinely nil and is printed as nil.Read that carefully, because zero here does not mean absent from the show. The spine names one lead per weekday: BRIEF and ADJUST to the Executive Manager, BUILD, GATE and PUBLISH to the Technical Operator, CHECKPOINT to the Producer. The remaining two days are attributed to everyone rather than to a seat — Wednesday CROSS reads counterparts and Friday DEMO reads each participant. Wednesday is this seat's day on air, and it is deliberately shared: the crossover exists so a creative runs a build and a technical writes a brief, both badly, in public. So the honest statement is that the Creative Lead is on air every single week and leads zero episodes by name — and only reading the spine tells you that.
The company runs 4 brands, and every one of them is listed — including the ones this seat has no pipeline on, because “nothing here” is an answer and an omission is not. This seat is on the hook for 2 of the rows below. Every brand is not a brand: it means the pipeline is brand-agnostic and serves all of them at once, so a failure there is felt everywhere simultaneously.
| Brand | Owns | Supports | This seat / all pipelines |
|---|---|---|---|
| Finessionals | none | none | 0 of 3 |
| Temerarii Media | none | none | 0 of 1 |
| Dom Davis Network | none | none | 0 of 1 |
| Lil Shop of Culture | none | PDP tile GIF engine, Virtual lookbook engine, Bully mascot worlds | 3 of 4 |
| Every brand | Storyboards, scripts and style direction | Universal brand baseline, Curation and repost engine, Any-brand intake | 4 of 4 |
Every pipeline carries what it is meant to teach and the method it is judged by. This is the assessment that is not a point value — the seat is a paid training position, and this is the syllabus.
| Pipeline | Teaches | Assessed by |
|---|---|---|
| Storyboards, scripts and style direction |
| verify_vo_caption_match plus the brand rails gates |
This is the section that prevents the arguments. Almost every dispute about a role is a dispute about its edge, not its centre — two people both believing something was the other's, or one person quietly annexing a decision that was never theirs. Writing the edge down is cheaper than settling it later, on air.
Conditions of the seat. They are stated up front because discovering one of them in week three is a wasted seat for everybody.
Standing rules for how this seat works — not skills, but positions already taken, so they are not re-argued every sprint.
20 of the 23 scoring rules apply to this seat — 19 that apply to everyone and 1 written for this track specifically. They split by who observes them: 14 are read by the machine and 6 are judged by a human. That split is the point of the format — the record is read from the system, not from anyone's recollection of your week.
Nobody types these in. An emitter already in the stack produces the record, which is why each one names the file that proves it. 9 of 14 have a live emitter today.
| What | Effect | Read from |
|---|---|---|
| The full gate suite green at the end of a week every seat | not set | engine/goal.pyprints GOAL ALIGNED |
| A blocker open more than three working days without its owner acting every seat | not set | engine/gates/verify_projects.pyprints PROJECTS PASS |
| A deliverable passed its target week without acceptance (owner seat) every seat | not set | engine/gates/verify_projects.pyprints PROJECTS PASS |
| A filed report not reviewed by the next standup (reviewer seat) every seat | not set | engine/gates/verify_eod_reports.pyprints EOD-REVIEW PASS |
| A missed calendar deadline every seat | -30 | engine/gates/verify_calendar_alignment.pyprints CALENDAR-ALIGN PASS |
| A missed or postponed KPI deadline agreed in sprint planning every seat | -20 | no emitter yet |
| An active deliverable with no acceptance criteria every seat | not set | engine/gates/verify_projects.pyprints PROJECTS PASS |
| Exposing an API key, token or secret in the repository every seat | -100 | engine/gates/verify_no_secrets.pyprints NO-SECRETS PASS |
| Late to an obligatory meeting, live broadcast or event every seat | -50 | no emitter yet |
| Missing end-of-day report — completed, blocking, next every seat | -10 | engine/gates/verify_eod_reports.pyprints EOD-REPORTS PASS |
| No acknowledgement of a direct communication within 4 hours of an operational window every seat | -15 | no emitter yet |
| Pushing unapproved or un-QA'd work to a live production surface every seat | -50 | no emitter yet |
| Submitting work that ignores the documented baseline every seat | -25 | engine/gates/verify_render_ready.pyprints RENDER-READY PASS |
| Work unreachable because it was never pushed, while the owner is offline every seat | -30 | no emitter yet |
These are the ones no emitter can settle: pacing, recovery and presence on air, whether a pitch landed, whether the room responded. The verdict is entered on the producer panel — which names where the call is recorded, not who forms it; an Executive Manager ruling lands on the same panel.
| What | Effect | Why a human and not a gate |
|---|---|---|
| A segment executed flawlessly on air every seat | not set | Genuinely human-judged |
| An aesthetic decision defended on air and upheld this track | not set | Genuinely human-judged, and the Creative Lead seat already requires willingness to have creative decisions reviewed on air (roles |
| Chat vibe check — the room responds to the segment every seat | not set | Genuinely human-judged |
| A pitch that fails its live review every seat | not set | Genuinely human-judged |
| Escalating without showing what you already tried every seat | -15 | Human-judged: whether self-help was shown is a reading of a message, not a field |
| Manually doing repetitive work the established tooling could automate every seat | -25 | Human-judged: 'could have been automated' is an engineering opinion about a specific task, and the Executive Manager's ruling is entered on the panel |
Total adjustments in any one week are capped at capped (see the agreement) of that week's rate. On this track the first round pays — a week, so the cap is — — the tightest it ever gets, because the first round is the lowest rate on the ladder.
| Rule | Effect | Past the cap by |
|---|---|---|
| Exposing an API key, token or secret in the repository | -100 | — over |
| Late to an obligatory meeting, live broadcast or event | -50 | — over |
| Pushing unapproved or un-QA'd work to a live production surface | -50 | — over |
engine/gates/verify_scoring.py reports the same thing on every run.Week one is exempt from all of it — see the pay section below — so the cap first bites in week two.
governance/scoring.json forbids printing a placeholder on a candidate page, and engine/gates/verify_scoring.py lists every one of them on every run. You will not be scored against a number you were never shown.The rate rises as the field narrows — fewer people, more work, more pay. Read from governance/pay.json; this page holds no copy of it.
| Track | Round 1 wks 1–4 · 3 seats | Round 2 wks 5–8 · 2 seats | Final wks 9–13 · 1 seat |
|---|---|---|---|
| Creative Lead | —/wk | —/wk | —/wk |
The post-season seat is not guaranteed. A post-season seat may be offered to any finalist at the Chairman's discretion. It is NOT guaranteed, and no candidate should accept on the expectation of one. It is said in these terms deliberately: a candidate who reads “the seat is the real prize” and then finds it discretionary was caught off guard, which is the one thing this framework forbids.
Total adjustments in any one week may not exceed capped (see the agreement) of that week's rate. Uncapped, the twelve rules could exceed the weekly rate — the spot-quiz alone at the agreed figure twice daily is the agreed figure against an EM's the agreed figure Round 1 week. A week worked for nothing is not a deterrent, it is an indefensible offer. On this track the worst possible Round 1 week still pays — — the rate less the cap, which is arithmetic rather than a promise.
The full adjustment schedule is on the operations policy, and every line of it has to be in front of you in writing before you sign.