Checklist the per-video bar — engine/sim
78.4/100
quantitative quality · weights learn from your reviews (
engine.sim.memory review thread-receipts-W35-Fri good|bad)⚠ 6 flag(s) — not yet ship-ready: too_complexlow_vo_coveragedead_airgeneric_scene · see docs/strategy/VIDEO-CHECKLIST.md
Composition comp · template family · expected output
9:16 Reelrendered1:1 Squarepending16:9 Widepending9:16 4Kpending1:1 4Kpending16:9 4KpendingGIF (SMS)pending
expected output: 1/7 rendered — same matrix the /media preview surfaces for this asset.
Composition layer × scene 5 scenes · 26.2s · comp_id + rendered still + tier + the script
| # | Layer (comp_id · still · tier) | Beat | Timecode | Motion | Logo | Audio | VO / on-screen / caption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  matches intent KpiGrid template | stat | 0–5.0s | receipts-count | icon·liquid-chrome | ♪ node_lock | A research report that used to take three days now takes three hours, fully sourced. on-screen: 3 days to 3 hours. |
expected on screen: red ground · a KpiGrid panel over a dimmed Signal Field · Magister leads · receipts · receipts-count · icon·liquid-chrome logo · caption bottom-left spec (the prompt): comp_id KpiGridvisual receiptsshape knotground redtreatment liquid-chromemotion receipts-countpower receiptsinstrument spotlight→3 days to 3 hours.curate kpis, statsLabels | |||||||
| 2 |  matches intent RankList template | proof | 5.0–10.0s | receipts-count | icon·white-knockout | ♪ node_lock | Open-tab research was slow and unchecked, every tab a different claim with no source attached. on-screen: Fan out. Verify. |
expected on screen: red ground · a RankList panel over a dimmed Signal Field · Magister leads · receipts · receipts-count · icon·white-knockout logo · caption bottom-left spec (the prompt): comp_id RankListvisual receiptsshape knotground redtreatment white-knockoutmotion receipts-countpower receiptsinstrument spotlight→Fan out. Verify.curate rows, statsLabels | |||||||
| 3 |  matches intent BuildLog template | diff | 10.0–16.2s | crossfade-8f | icon·liquid-chrome | ♪ node_lock | Research of the future cites itself. Fan out, check each source, then write. on-screen: Verify, then write. |
expected on screen: red ground · a BuildLog panel over a dimmed Signal Field · Magister leads · code · crossfade-8f · icon·liquid-chrome logo · caption bottom-left spec (the prompt): comp_id BuildLogvisual codeshape knotground redtreatment liquid-chromemotion crossfade-8fpower morphinstrument morph→Verify, then write.curate codeLines, lines | |||||||
| 4 |  first render · fix pending PipelineMap templatedead_airgeneric_scene | step | 16.2–21.2s | kinetic-build | icon·white-knockout | ♪ node_lock | Receipts |
expected on screen: red ground · a PipelineMap panel over a dimmed Signal Field · Magister leads · pipeline · kinetic-build · icon·white-knockout logo · caption bottom-left spec (the prompt): comp_id PipelineMapvisual pipelineshape knotground redtreatment white-knockoutmotion kinetic-buildpower throwinstrument laser-trace→Receiptscurate stages, steps | |||||||
| 5 |  first render · fix pending shared field signature-3ddead_airgeneric_scene | resolve | 21.2–26.2s | coalescence | icon·white-knockout | ♪ bed_out | Receipts |
expected on screen: red ground · knot hero in the shared Signal Field · Magister leads · coalescence · coalescence · icon·white-knockout logo · caption bottom-left spec (the prompt): comp_id shared Signal Fieldvisual coalescenceshape knotground redtreatment white-knockoutmotion coalescencepower coalescenceinstrument coalescence→Receipts | |||||||
Format stack 3 aspects · same scenes[], re-cropped
9:16
1080×1920
Stories · TikTok · YouTube Shorts · Reels
1:1
1080×1080
LinkedIn · Facebook · Instagram
16:9
1920×1080
X/Twitter · YouTube · LinkedIn video
Channels 9 destinations
LinkedInX/TwitterYouTubeInstagramFacebookThreadsTikTokPinterestBluesky
Social captions supplemental published copy · per channel (comp_id level)
tiktokReceipt: a research report that used to take three days now takes three hours, fully sourced. Open-tab research was slow and unverified. The fix: fan out, check each source, then write. (AI-assisted)
instagramReceipt.
Research report: 3 days to 3 hours.
Fully sourced.
Old way: open tabs, slow, unverified.
New way: fan out. Verify. Then write.
#deepresearch #ai #productivity #research #buildinpublic
linkedinReceipt: a research report that used to take three days now takes three hours, fully sourced. That's our own work, not a claim from a deck.
The old way was open-tab research, slow and unverified. The method that changed it: fan out across sources in parallel, verify each claim against its source, then synthesize.
Research of the future cites itself. Verify first, write second.
xReceipt: a research report that took three days now takes three hours, fully sourced. The method: fan out across sources, verify each claim, then write. temerarii.xyz/build
facebookReceipt: a research report that used to take us three days now takes three hours, and it's fully sourced. The old open-tab way was slow and unverified. The method that fixed it: fan out across sources, verify each claim against its source, then write. Try it on your next report.
threadsReceipt: a research report that used to take three days now takes three hours, fully sourced.
Open-tab research was slow and unverified. The method: fan out across sources, verify each claim, then write. Research of the future cites itself.
pinterestHow we cut a research report from three days to three hours, fully sourced. The method: fan out across many sources in parallel, verify each claim against its source, then synthesize the writing. Open-tab research is slow and unverified, this is faster and cited. Deep research workflow with AI for faster, sourced reports.
blueskyReceipt: a research report that took three days now takes three hours, fully sourced. The method: fan out across sources, verify each claim, then write. Research of the future cites itself.
youtubeTitle: Receipt, A Research Report From Three Days to Three Hours
A research report that used to take us three days now takes three hours, fully sourced. That's our own work, shown not claimed. The old way was open-tab research: slow and unverified. The method that changed it: fan out across sources in parallel, verify each claim against its source, then synthesize the write-up. Research of the future cites itself. Verify first, write second.