Checklist the per-video bar — engine/sim
86.6/100
quantitative quality · weights learn from your reviews (
engine.sim.memory review social-W28-Sat-4 good|bad)⚠ 3 flag(s) — not yet ship-ready: copy_genericdup_sequence_across_assetsdup_set_across_assets · see docs/strategy/VIDEO-CHECKLIST.md
Composition comp · template family · expected output
9:16 Reelpending1:1 Squarepending16:9 Widepending9:16 4Kpending1:1 4Kpending16:9 4KpendingGIF (SMS)pending
render pending — silent master not yet on disk
expected output: 0/7 rendered — same matrix the /media preview surfaces for this asset.
Composition layer × scene 9 scenes · 47.5s · comp_id + rendered still + tier + the script
| # | Layer (comp_id · still · tier) | Beat | Timecode | Motion | Logo | Audio | VO / on-screen / caption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  matches intent shared field signature-3d | open | 0–5.0s | spatial-parallax | icon·white-knockout | ♪ bed_in | Automations used to live in a drag-and-drop maze of boxes and wires. on-screen: Workflows lived in a drag-drop maze |
expected on screen: red ground · octa hero in the shared Signal Field · Lumen leads · node-graph · spatial-parallax · icon·white-knockout logo · caption bottom-left spec (the prompt): comp_id shared Signal Fieldvisual node-graphshape octaground redtreatment white-knockoutmotion spatial-parallaxpower summoninstrument summon→Workflows lived in a drag-drop maze | |||||||
| 2 |  matches intent shared field signature-3d | hook | 5.0–10.0s | kinetic-build | icon·white-knockout | ♪ node_lock | One small change broke three hidden nodes you forgot were even there. on-screen: One change broke three hidden nodes |
expected on screen: red ground · octa hero in the shared Signal Field · Lumen leads · mark · kinetic-build · icon·white-knockout logo · caption bottom-left spec (the prompt): comp_id shared Signal Fieldvisual markshape octaground redtreatment white-knockoutmotion kinetic-buildpower laser-lockinstrument laser-trace→One change broke three hidden nodes | |||||||
| 3 |  matches intent NumberedList template | teach | 10.0–16.3s | kinetic-build | icon·liquid-chrome | ♪ node_lock | The move is to write the workflow as typed code you can read top to bottom. on-screen: Write the workflow as typed code |
expected on screen: red ground · a NumberedList panel over a dimmed Signal Field · Lumen leads · node-graph · kinetic-build · icon·liquid-chrome logo · caption bottom-left spec (the prompt): comp_id NumberedListvisual node-graphshape octaground redtreatment liquid-chromemotion kinetic-buildpower morphinstrument morph+laser→Write the workflow as typed codecurate items, nodes | |||||||
| 4 |  matches intent ComparisonTable template | proof | 16.3–21.3s | receipts-count | icon·white-knockout | ♪ node_lock | Each step becomes a plain function you can test, version, and explain. on-screen: Each step is a function you test |
expected on screen: red ground · a ComparisonTable panel over a dimmed Signal Field · Lumen leads · receipts · receipts-count · icon·white-knockout logo · caption bottom-left spec (the prompt): comp_id ComparisonTablevisual receiptsshape octaground redtreatment white-knockoutmotion receipts-countpower receiptsinstrument spotlight→Each step is a function you testcurate colA, colB, rows, statsLabels | |||||||
| 5 |  matches intent JsonDiff template | diff | 21.3–26.8s | crossfade-8f | icon·liquid-chrome | ♪ node_lock | The difference is code you can read beats a tangle of boxes you can't. on-screen: Code beats a tangle of boxes |
expected on screen: red ground · a JsonDiff panel over a dimmed Signal Field · Lumen leads · code · crossfade-8f · icon·liquid-chrome logo · caption bottom-left spec (the prompt): comp_id JsonDiffvisual codeshape octaground redtreatment liquid-chromemotion crossfade-8fpower morphinstrument morph→Code beats a tangle of boxescurate codeLines, fileName, lines | |||||||
| 6 |  matches intent ChecklistCard template | teach | 26.8–32.0s | kinetic-build | icon·white-knockout | ♪ node_lock | Let the type checker catch the broken handoff before it ever runs live. on-screen: Let the type checker catch mistakes |
expected on screen: red ground · a ChecklistCard panel over a dimmed Signal Field · Lumen leads · node-graph · kinetic-build · icon·white-knockout logo · caption bottom-left spec (the prompt): comp_id ChecklistCardvisual node-graphshape octaground redtreatment white-knockoutmotion kinetic-buildpower morphinstrument morph+laser→Let the type checker catch mistakescurate items, nodes | |||||||
| 7 |  matches intent KpiGrid template | proof | 32.0–37.0s | receipts-count | icon·liquid-chrome | ♪ node_lock | The workflow becomes structured data you own, not a screenshot you fear. on-screen: The workflow is now real data |
expected on screen: red ground · a KpiGrid panel over a dimmed Signal Field · Lumen leads · receipts · receipts-count · icon·liquid-chrome logo · caption bottom-left spec (the prompt): comp_id KpiGridvisual receiptsshape octaground redtreatment liquid-chromemotion receipts-countpower receiptsinstrument spotlight→The workflow is now real datacurate kpis, statsLabels | |||||||
| 8 |  matches intent SchematicCard template | step | 37.0–42.5s | kinetic-build | icon·white-knockout | ♪ node_lock | Your step: take one small flow, rewrite it as a typed function, test it. on-screen: Your step: rewrite one flow as code |
expected on screen: red ground · a SchematicCard panel over a dimmed Signal Field · Lumen leads · pipeline · kinetic-build · icon·white-knockout logo · caption bottom-left spec (the prompt): comp_id SchematicCardvisual pipelineshape octaground redtreatment white-knockoutmotion kinetic-buildpower throwinstrument laser-trace→Your step: rewrite one flow as codecurate nodes, stages, steps | |||||||
| 9 |  matches intent shared field signature-3d | resolve | 42.5–47.5s | coalescence | icon·white-knockout | ♪ bed_out | Automation should be code you can read, not a maze you dread. on-screen: Automation you can actually read |
expected on screen: red ground · octa hero in the shared Signal Field · Lumen leads · coalescence · coalescence · icon·white-knockout logo · caption bottom-left spec (the prompt): comp_id shared Signal Fieldvisual coalescenceshape octaground redtreatment white-knockoutmotion coalescencepower coalescenceinstrument coalescence→Automation you can actually read | |||||||
Format stack 3 aspects · same scenes[], re-cropped
9:16
1080×1920
Stories · TikTok · YouTube Shorts · Reels
1:1
1080×1080
LinkedIn · Facebook · Instagram
16:9
1920×1080
X/Twitter · YouTube · LinkedIn video
Channels 9 destinations
LinkedInX/TwitterYouTubeInstagramFacebookThreadsTikTokPinterestBluesky
Social captions supplemental published copy · per channel (comp_id level)
tiktokfrom drag-drop automations to typed python (AI-assisted): one change in a node maze breaks 3 hidden boxes. write the workflow as typed code, each step is a function you can test and read. the type checker catches the broken handoff. #automation #python #coding
instagramNode mazes break on one change.
Write the workflow as typed code.
Each step is a function you test.
Automation you can actually read.
#python #automation #coding #developer #tech
linkedinTakeaway: moving automations from a drag-and-drop maze to typed Python turns fragile boxes into code you can read, test, and version. One small change in a visual tool breaks hidden nodes; a typed function lets the type checker catch the broken handoff before it runs live. The workflow becomes structured data you own, not a screenshot you fear. Automation should be code you can read, not a maze you dread.
xFrom drag-drop automations to typed Python: one change in a node maze breaks 3 hidden boxes. Write the workflow as code, each step a function you can test. temerarii.com
facebookAutomations used to live in a drag-and-drop maze where one small change broke three hidden nodes. The move is to write the workflow as typed code: each step a function you can test, version, and explain. More at temerarii.com.
threadsFrom drag-drop automations to typed Python: one change in a node maze breaks 3 hidden boxes. Write the workflow as typed code, each step a function you can test and read. The type checker catches the broken handoff.
pinterestMoving automations from n8n to typed Python: workflows as structured code, each step a testable function, type checking to catch errors. Workflow automation, Python tips, developer tooling, code over no-code, maintainable automation.
blueskyFrom drag-drop automations to typed Python: one change in a node maze breaks 3 hidden boxes. Write the workflow as code, each step a function you can test. temerarii.com
youtubeFrom n8n To Typed Python: Workflows You Can Actually Read
Automations used to live in a drag-and-drop maze of boxes and wires, where one small change broke three hidden nodes you forgot were there. This short shows the move: write the workflow as typed code you can read top to bottom, where each step is a plain function you can test, version, and explain. Let the type checker catch the broken handoff before it ever runs live. The workflow becomes structured data you own, not a screenshot you fear. AI-assisted. More at temerarii.com.