Copy the published post text
Event Coordination
copy ready · render pending
Output-policy spec format · dimensions (asset_specs.output_policy)
formatnative cut · 9:16 · 1:1 · 16:9
dims1080×1920 · 1080×1080 · 1920×1080
cadence5/day floor × 9 channels
Channels 9 destinations
TikTokInstagramLinkedInX/TwitterFacebookThreadsPinterestBlueskyYouTube
This post a distinct social asset — its own angle, storyboard, and cuts
social-W33-Sun-4
5-distinct-social/day · 9:16 master → 1:1 / 16:9 cuts per channel
Channel-cuts this asset → 9 native captions (one master · per-platform aspect+copy)
| Channel | Native caption |
|---|---|
| Tiktok | Soon your product spec writes the first version of the app. (AI-assisted) The move: write the spec as STRUCTURED DATA, goals and rules as fields, acceptance tests inside it. A model scaffolds screens, tests, and tickets from the file. A doc humans read is a wish. A spec a machine reads is a plan. |
| Stop writing product docs nobody reads. Write the spec as data: goals, rules, edge cases as fields. Attach acceptance tests. Let the model scaffold the build. #productmanagement #spec #aitools #buildinpublic #softwaredev | |
| We're close to a world where a clear product spec writes most of the first version itself. The shift: stop writing long prose docs engineering skims and ignores. Write the spec as structured data, with goals, rules, and edge cases as plain fields, and attach acceptance tests right inside it. Now a model can read that file and scaffold the screens, tests, and tickets directly. A doc only humans can read is a wish. A spec a machine can read is a plan. When the spec is the source of truth, the PM stops writing prose and starts designing the system. | |
| X | Soon the spec writes the first version of the app. Write it as structured data: goals, rules, edge cases as fields, acceptance tests inside. A doc humans read is a wish. A spec a machine reads is a plan. temerarii.com |
| We're close to product specs that write the first version themselves. The move: write the spec as structured data, with goals and rules as fields and acceptance tests inside, so a model can scaffold screens, tests, and tickets from it. A spec a machine can read is a plan. temerarii.com | |
| Threads | Soon a clear product spec writes the first version of the app. Write it as structured data: goals, rules, edge cases as fields, acceptance tests inside. The model scaffolds the build. A doc humans read is a wish. A machine-readable spec is a plan. |
| Future of product management: write specs as structured data with goals, rules, and acceptance tests as fields so AI can scaffold the build. Spec-driven development, machine-readable product spec, AI product management, acceptance test design. | |
| Bluesky | Soon the spec writes the first version of the app. Write it as structured data: goals, rules, acceptance tests as fields. A doc humans read is a wish, a machine-readable spec is a plan. temerarii.com |
| Youtube | Product Management: Write Specs as Data, Let AI Build We're close to product specs that write the first version of an app themselves. This short shows the move: stop writing long prose docs engineering ignores. Write the spec as structured data, with goals, rules, and edge cases as plain fields, and attach acceptance tests right inside it. A model can then scaffold the screens, tests, and tickets directly from the file. A doc only humans can read is a wish. A spec a machine can read is a plan. The PM becomes the architect. #productmanagement #spec #aitools |
Composition layer × scene 9 scenes · this post's OWN storyboard (distinct per asset)
| # | Layer (comp_id · still · tier) | Beat | Timecode | Motion | Logo | Audio | VO / on-screen / caption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | matches intent shared field signature-3d | open | 0–7.0s | spatial-parallax | icon·ember-fill | ♪ bed_in | We are close to a world where a clear product spec writes most of the first version itself. on-screen: Soon the spec writes the app |
expected on screen: black ground · tetra hero in the shared Signal Field · Nexus leads · node-graph · spatial-parallax · icon·ember-fill logo · caption bottom-left spec (the prompt): comp_id shared Signal Fieldvisual node-graphshape tetraground blacktreatment ember-fillmotion spatial-parallaxpower summoninstrument summon→Soon the spec writes the app | |||||||
| 2 |  matches intent shared field signature-3d | hook | 7.0–13.3s | kinetic-build | icon·wireframe | ♪ node_lock | Old way, the product manager wrote a long doc that engineering skimmed and then quietly ignored. on-screen: The old way: a doc nobody read |
expected on screen: black ground · tetra hero in the shared Signal Field · Nexus leads · mark · kinetic-build · icon·wireframe logo · caption bottom-left spec (the prompt): comp_id shared Signal Fieldvisual markshape tetraground blacktreatment wireframemotion kinetic-buildpower laser-lockinstrument laser-trace→The old way: a doc nobody read | |||||||
| 3 |  matches intent NumberedList template | teach | 13.3–20.6s | kinetic-build | icon·wireframe | ♪ node_lock | Here is the move: write your spec as structured data, with goals, rules, and edge cases as plain fields. on-screen: Write the spec as data |
expected on screen: black ground · a NumberedList panel over a dimmed Signal Field · Nexus leads · node-graph · kinetic-build · icon·wireframe logo · caption bottom-left spec (the prompt): comp_id NumberedListvisual node-graphshape tetraground blacktreatment wireframemotion kinetic-buildpower morphinstrument morph+laser→Write the spec as datacurate items, nodes | |||||||
| 4 |  matches intent ComparisonTable template | proof | 20.6–27.200000000000003s | receipts-count | icon·wireframe | ♪ node_lock | Now a model can read that file and scaffold the screens, tests, and tickets straight from it. on-screen: Machine reads it, builds the stub |
expected on screen: black ground · a ComparisonTable panel over a dimmed Signal Field · Nexus leads · receipts · receipts-count · icon·wireframe logo · caption bottom-left spec (the prompt): comp_id ComparisonTablevisual receiptsshape tetraground blacktreatment wireframemotion receipts-countpower receiptsinstrument spotlight→Machine reads it, builds the stubcurate colA, colB, rows, statsLabels | |||||||
| 5 |  matches intent JsonDiff template | diff | 27.2–34.5s | crossfade-8f | icon·wireframe | ♪ node_lock | A doc that only humans can read is a wish. A spec a machine can read is a plan. on-screen: A spec a machine can read |
expected on screen: black ground · a JsonDiff panel over a dimmed Signal Field · Nexus leads · code · crossfade-8f · icon·wireframe logo · caption bottom-left spec (the prompt): comp_id JsonDiffvisual codeshape tetraground blacktreatment wireframemotion crossfade-8fpower morphinstrument morph→A spec a machine can readcurate codeLines, fileName, lines | |||||||
| 6 |  matches intent ChecklistCard template | teach | 34.5–41.1s | kinetic-build | icon·wireframe | ♪ node_lock | Add acceptance tests right inside the spec, so done is defined before a single line gets written. on-screen: Put acceptance tests in the spec |
expected on screen: black ground · a ChecklistCard panel over a dimmed Signal Field · Nexus leads · node-graph · kinetic-build · icon·wireframe logo · caption bottom-left spec (the prompt): comp_id ChecklistCardvisual node-graphshape tetraground blacktreatment wireframemotion kinetic-buildpower morphinstrument morph+laser→Put acceptance tests in the speccurate items, nodes | |||||||
| 7 |  matches intent KpiGrid template | proof | 41.1–47.7s | receipts-count | icon·wireframe | ♪ node_lock | The build runs the spec tests, and when they pass, everybody agrees the feature is actually finished. on-screen: Tests pass, the feature is done |
expected on screen: black ground · a KpiGrid panel over a dimmed Signal Field · Nexus leads · receipts · receipts-count · icon·wireframe logo · caption bottom-left spec (the prompt): comp_id KpiGridvisual receiptsshape tetraground blacktreatment wireframemotion receipts-countpower receiptsinstrument spotlight→Tests pass, the feature is donecurate kpis, statsLabels | |||||||
| 8 |  matches intent ProcessFlow template | step | 47.7–54.7s | kinetic-build | icon·wireframe | ♪ node_lock | Three steps: write goals and rules as fields, attach acceptance tests, then let the model generate the stub. on-screen: Step: goals, rules, tests, generate |
expected on screen: black ground · a ProcessFlow panel over a dimmed Signal Field · Nexus leads · pipeline · kinetic-build · icon·wireframe logo · caption bottom-left spec (the prompt): comp_id ProcessFlowvisual pipelineshape tetraground blacktreatment wireframemotion kinetic-buildpower throwinstrument laser-trace→Step: goals, rules, tests, generatecurate stages, steps | |||||||
| 9 |  matches intent shared field signature-3d | resolve | 54.7–61.300000000000004s | coalescence | icon·ember-fill | ♪ bed_out | When the spec is the source, the product manager stops writing prose and starts designing the system. on-screen: The PM becomes the architect |
expected on screen: black ground · tetra hero in the shared Signal Field · Nexus leads · coalescence · coalescence · icon·ember-fill logo · caption bottom-left spec (the prompt): comp_id shared Signal Fieldvisual coalescenceshape tetraground blacktreatment ember-fillmotion coalescencepower coalescenceinstrument coalescence→The PM becomes the architect | |||||||